Posts Tagged ‘House’
Felton Newell for Congress – Campaign Announcement
Watch as Los Angeles Deputy City Attorney Felton Newell announces that he is a candidate to represent California’s 33rd Congressional District in the June 8, 2010 election
Twitter Updates for 2009-05-09
- @lauriepercival Did I see you mention Coin Op yesterday? I actually went to Art Center with @pennyman. It’s a small Twitterverse. in reply to lauriepercival #
- RT @Krom4Congress: Share Mother’s Day with me & my family at: http://www.actblue.com/page/krommothersday #
- @pennyman I’ll come post-March 19 Special Election. Very busy right now. Now if someone can just watch the kids, Jennifer can come too! in reply to pennyman #
- Arrived at FAME for setup of Budget Reform townhall with Speaker Bass and coalition partners. Underestimated driving time w/o traffic. #
- CDP Regional Director Terrence Montgomery kicks things off. #
- Speaker Karen Bass adressing a packed house at 10:00 AM Saturday. People have a lot of questions and concerns about California’s future. #
- Mary Rose Ortega – a teacher for 26 years – talks about importance of passing Props 1A and 1B to save critical school funding. #
- Rochelle from the California PTA stands up to speak on Propositions 1A & 1B. On education: “need an investment to match our expectations.” #
- Kathy Icenhower of Shields for Families makes a compelling case for Props 1D & 1E from a caregiver’s point of view. #
- AARP representative: “We’re at a Church…remember Noah and work two by two. Call two friends or family. Have them call two others.” #
- @thereisnoplan Agree with you (for the most part) and would love a Constitutional Convention to sort out the mess. How does that help today? in reply to thereisnoplan #
Beth Krom for Congress – Mothers Day 2009 Message
A special Mothers Day 2009 message from former Irvine Mayor Beth Krom and her mother, Elaine Weinstein.
Learn more about Beth’s term as Mayor and her campaign to represent California’s 48th Congressional District at:
http://www.BethKrom.com
Or follower her campaign at http://twitter.com/Krom4Congress or http://www.facebook.com/people/Beth-K…
(And stay tuned at the end for some words from Beth’s three kids; Hershel, Noah and Abby!)
SF Chronicle: For Brown and Newsom, Age Is Just a Number (of Facebook friends)
A line of differentiation is appearing in the California Gubernatorial Primary.
It’s a generational line.
Emboldened by the hip young cat who brushed off claims of inexperience and won the White House, the exploratory campaign of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom (Born: 1967) is making no bones about casting their main opponent – Attorney General Jerry Brown (Born: Before the Earth cooled) – as old…
“This will no doubt be the first governor’s race in California history – if not nationally – where one candidate sat on the other candidate’s lap as a little kid,” crows Newsom political consultant Garry South…Â (San Francisco Chronicle)
…or out of touch:
“The question that I think Californians will have to come to grips with is, does California need the same governor in 2011 that it had in 1975?” said Newsom strategist Garry South. (Los Angeles Times)
Oh, that Garry South. Such a trouble maker.
Who knows if this line of attack works? We’re not talking about John McCain here. This is Jerry Brown – a very different opponent to label as old or out of touch.
That didn’t stop the Chronicle from looking for age spots on Brown’s campaign techniques:
Example: the dramatic disparity between Brown and Newsom on the social networking site, Facebook, a spectacularly successful fundraising and networking tool for President Obama’s campaign.
Newsom has launched an effort to raise “30,000 supporters in 30 days,” already amassing more than 25,000 contacts on his Facebook site, with 300-400 more signing up daily. Brown, son of the late Gov. Edmund G. “Pat” Brown, has less than 700 Facebook contacts.
The San Francisco mayor has used Facebook, Twitter, his Web site and blogs (on Daily Kos and Huffington Post) – all tools that appeal to younger voters – to attract hundreds of people around the state to town hall meetings in the past month. (San Francisco Chronicle)
Here are a few bones I have to pick with this analysis…
First, recent Pew findings deflate the “internet is for young folks” myth:
Contrary to the image of Generation Y as the “Net Generation,” internet users in their 20s do not dominate every aspect of online life. Generation X is the most likely group to bank, shop, and look for health information online. Boomers are just as likely as Generation Y to make travel reservations online. And even Silent Generation internet users are competitive when it comes to email (although teens might point out that this is proof that email is for old people). (Pew Internet and American Life Project)
Next, all of the candidates; Newsom, Brown, Garamendi and Villaraigosa are on Facebook. You can also find Antonio, John, Jerry and Gavin on Twitter. I’ve seen several of them as authors on prominent blogs, and all are tapping their respective email lists.
Finally, victory isn’t as simple as merely using the tools, or amassing high friend-counts on the SocNets. It’s about establishing bi-directional communication, speaking in the language of the web (which changes daily), and showing something authentic to the online community’s magnificently well-honed bullshit detector.
Take the Facebook numbers cited in the Chronicle…
When his campaign launched this friendraiser, Newsom already had about 23,000 supporters banked. In the two weeks since – with active outreach on Facebook and multiple blasts to their email lists – they’ve climbed to just over 27,000. Growth of 4,000 (about 17%) over two weeks. Not too shabby.
On the other hand, Jerry Brown had only 400 friends and change when he dropped his 25 Random Things list at the end of last week. In the week since, Jerry has shot up to over 1,500 friends (over 350% growth) with little extra effort. His novelty and authenticity also earned several earned media hits in meatspace.
The raw numbers are still very much on Newsom’s side, but Brown’s tapping of the meme-of-the-moment had a dramatic effect on the reach of his online community. For that instant, it was Brown who was more fluent in the language of the web.
Online Organizing is not unlike Field Organizing; The Grind does matter. But catching that imaginative spark – riding that wave of the internet zeitgeist – can supercharge you in bursts.
Staying open to those memes and turning those bursts into your Grind is how you dominate.
Behold! It’s Your Congress on YouTube
In a pair of advertising-free zones within the YouTube-iverse, your United State House and Senate are embarking on an adventurous new way of communicating with the American people.
Here’s how YouTube lays it out:
So, why are your elected leaders coming to YouTube? The short answer is: you. Your use of YouTube and other online platforms to speak up on political issues and hold your leaders accountable has shown just how powerful this medium can be. You’ve shown your elected officials that in order to be in contact with you, they need to come to the platforms you use most, and engage with you directly. (YouTube Blog)
The Introductory video is suffers a little from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s performance – if this video is Valkyrie, McConnell is Tom Cruise – but Reid, Pelosi and Boehner are game and do a good (albeit stiff) job of sharing the thinking behind this project.
I took a few minutes to check out some of the other clips, and one Member’s work surprised me. Republican Representative Howard “Buck” McKeown, from California’s 25th Congressional District.
The good folks at TechPresident also took notice of the Man From Santa Clarita:
McKeon introduces his interns, legislative staff, and the person who will answer your call should you ask for information on a congressional tour. At one point, McKeon even turns the camera on his startled “new media guy” named Robert. It’s well worth a watch to see Hill staffers in their natural habitat. (TechPresident)
What is it about Latter Day Saints officeholders that makes them such natural YouTube stars? MittTV was a gem in the primaries, and now Buck McKeon (of all people!) is turning in interesting product in the sphere.
I may never watch a video with any of the congressional leadership again, but I’ll be keeping an eye on that Congressman directly to my north. Sadly, I may be the only one…McKeon’s 13 videos (dating back seven months) total up to less than a thousand views; 862 at the time of my writing this.
Watch This: GOOD Magazine Breaks Down Fundraising for the First Billion Dollar Race for the White House
Fundraising flunkies and compliance junkies:
Check out this great motion piece breaking down the who’s got the bucks and where the cash comes from in the first $1,000,000,000 campaign.
Brought to you by the great folks at GOOD Magazine.
Kid and Play were NOT in attendance, but Barack was on the phone.
Ah. The house party. Staple of organizing.
What once was a time for community to draw together in discussion, is now a chance for neighbors to sit and listen to a conference call together.
Because nothing forges neighborly bonds like deciding who gets to say their name before pressing pound.
Press one if you are fired up. Press two if you’re ready to go.
Elizabeth Kucinich Follows My Lead
When I was young, and still living in Denver, I spent many school nights kicking around in downtown coffee houses. Paris on the Platte was a favorite. The Market in LoDo and St. Mark’s (around the corner) were habitual haunts of my friends and I. Whenever the Psychodelic Zombiez or my pals in On Second Thought played the Mercury Cafe, I’d certainly be found there.
On more than a few occasions, I played the open mic nights at “The Merc” myself.
The video above brought memories flooding back, as I watched Elizabeth Kucinich speak to supporters at The Mercury Cafe. Lord knows what a blubbering, emotional mess I’ll become when the convention takes me back to the city that raised me.
Zennie was a Friend of Mine: Obama supporter covers the California HillStars program
Okay. I lied. Zennie is not a friend of mine.
I haven’t even met the guy.
I’m guessing after this video, he’ll be no friend of the Clinton campaign (including my old pal Mike Trujillo, their California Field Director).
With all of this, it still pales in comparison to the hundreds of online groups and members of BarackObama.com who are in California. What HillStars is has been in place for a long time, but only recently honed by an effort called “Camp Obama” which is already in motion nationwide. With little effort, the Obama forces could clobber Hillary Clinton in California.
Oh and that Field Poll of “Democratic Voters most likely to vote” that reports Clinton’s “lead” — don’t bet on any poll that has a sample size of just 419 people and talks to a small set folks who voted in the 2004 election. There are several problems with this step, amoung them, YouTube didn’t exist in 2004. So all of these polls of “most likely to vote” Democrats — including the rigged USA Today /Gallup Poll of June 17th — totally miss the new netroots. If a person just turned 18 that year, and didn’t vote, they’re now 22 years old, ready to vote, and consume the majority of their information online.
Senator Clinton, beware! ( Zennie’s Zeitgeist: HillStars – The Detailed Playbook On Senator Clinton’s California Campaign)
Now the tracker/muck-raker/opposition researcher in me wonders where he got the documents? Did he surreptitiously infiltrate one of the many HillStars trainings held so far in California? Trainings like the one in the Clinton blog post below:
Hillary Clinton’s California campaign today drew over 150 new volunteers for a day-long training to become the elite HillStars. These volunteers have committed to work continuously from July to February 5, to identify and to get out to vote 2 million Hillary Clinton supporters in California. HillStars are responsible for holding a house party to recruit, train and manage California Hillary Corps members, who will be talking to millions of California voters. In San Francisco, HillStar volunteers came from as far away as Fresno, Milpitas and Stockton. In Los Angeles, volunteers came from as far away as Santa Barbara and Orange County. (HillaryClinton.com: California Launches Aggressive Field Program)
However he got his hands on them, I’m guessing the next HillStars training will include at least a quick pat-down – if not a body cavity search – to see if any potential moles are doing their best Sandy Berger imitation.
Spike Jonze + YouTube = Al Gore is President? (or How the Wooden VP Became a Real Boy)
Going through unlabeled tracks in my iTunes library, I came across “What’s Up Fatlip?” by Fatlip (formerly of The Pharcyde). It got me thinking of the song’s excellent video – directed by Spike Jonze (see below).
Around the same time he was making videos and documentaries with Fatip, Jonze created a piece for the 2000 Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles. It’s in the Brightcove player you see above. If I remember correctly, the video aired in the afternoon during one of the sessions early in the convention week. As such, it was relegated to that portion of the convention that only those of us in the hall and C-Span viewers witnessed. Count yourself among the few to have seen it.
Had there been a distribution channel like YouTube in 2000, this is the kind of video that could have been tremendously effective. Apart from being too long (remember it was for a the most partisan captive audience imaginable), this piece had the right stuff to spread far and chop down Gore’s wooden image – not so much by defying that image, but reveling in it.
Forget the fact that you see Al Gore shirtless and body surfing. Any candidate can take off their shirt. Gore strips off the trappings of a life in politics.
The scene of Gore Family Movie Night is great. You see all of the things people tended to not like about Gore, that he is cerebral and a bit nitpicky…but it’s about which movies to pop in the VCR – and even how they get watched! As his kids gang up on him – even mocking his voice and demeanor – you see those qualities that were off-putting in the first debate in an “everyday people” light. All of those male voters who “wanted to have a beer” with Bush could watch that scene and instantly identify with the dad getting ribbed by his wife and kids.
I know I can relate.
Watch the scenes with Tipper and think about all the contrived videos you’ve ever seen of candidates and their wives (I’m looking at you, Mitt Romney). Watch his confidence and comfort in talking about global warming (famously verboten from the campaign at large). It’s no surprise that people started to like Gore more after An Inconvenient Truth. Jonze got that same performance years earlier.
For all of Hillary Clinton’s meticulously crafted attempts at humor, her trilogy of Song Contest films pale next to the humanizing power of Jonze’s loose, disarming Gore film. Hillary’s videos are clever and well produced, but how many of the views are like gawkers at a car crash…
“Oh my God…is she dancing?” or “Is that Bill? I can’t believe it.”
It’s a shock to see the Clinton’s in that light. It’s effective, but clearly canned. Jonze escapes that with Gore. From the last scene, it is clear that Jonze has just been rolling tape after tape after tape. It’s really just Gore talking…being Gore – to fall into the cliche.
Long disappeared, this video found re-release in the inaugural issue of Wolphin, a DVD magazine of unreleased short films. This first issue also contains the great Soldier’s Pay, by David O. Russell – director of I Heart Huckabee’s, Three Kings, and indie classic Spanking the Monkey. You can subscribe to Wolphin, or buy back-issues on their website.
The page on the Gore film features an interview with Jonze:
Q: So you just spent one day with them? You started in Carthage, Tennessee?
SJ: Yeah, I went down there to Tennessee and it was supposed to be just an afternoon. I guess he had liked my movie Being John Malkovich and so from that had I don’t know why he gave me this sort of access. It was very intimate and personal in terms of letting a cameraman into your home, but I guess that after the afternoon, they felt comfortable with me, so they invited me to go on their vacation. They were leaving that day to go to North Carolina, so in the middle of the afternoon the helicopters came and landed in the Tennessee farmhouse and we went to the army base and got on Air Force Two and flew to North Carolina. (Wolphin @ McSweeney’s)
For your viewing pleasure, here is the Spike Jonze-directed video for What’s Up Fatlip:
Walk for Change: San Fernando Valley
Here’s a little piece (the first of two) from the San Fernando Valley “Walk for Change” canvassing event for the Obama’08 campaign. For other pieces from the Walk for Change, check out PrezVid or BarackTV.
Dodd in Syndication
Because I like this idea, and because he gave me a few minutes of his time at the California Convention, I’m going to go ahead and reprint an email I just received from the Chris Dodd campaign.
In a few minutes they’ll be doing a live stream from Iowa, the beginning of D-Span – an effort to stream large amounts of Senator Dodd’s campaign live.
So, I get this email and follow the link. The video page has a place to sign-up for programming updates. But what I really like is the box of code to embed the live feed on your own site.
Dodd is in syndication!
Maybe I haven’t been paying attention, but I don’t remember seeing other candidates syndicating live video feeds.
|
|||||||||
This Never-Before-Seen Footage…
The Third Pillar: Exclusivity
In the First Pillar: Frequency, I discussed the need to shoot a lot and release a lot – providing you with the two things that make your program work: footage and viewers.
In the Second Pillar: Interactivity, I tackled what to put into your pieces – namely, two-way conversation via video. I looked at the need to join existing conversations and to start them – to both ask and answer questions – being sure to listen all the while. This may call for specific shooting with the candidate, or recycling of event footage…with brief reply clips a better use of policy footage than one long speech.
Better use of event footage leads to the Third Pillar: Exclusivity.
So, you’re shooting all the time. What does that mean? That you go to every event and film? Of course. You should certainly film every event. But, know that you won’t be the only one shooting.
Events are for the benefit of the media, who you hope will be shooting and putting it out there. They are for the benefit of voters, more and more of whom are carrying cameras of their own.
Cruise YouTube for videos of campaign events and you’ll find them. Alongside official campaign videos will be shaky cell phone footage of what some audience member found to be the most important or interesting part of the speech.
Don’t be surprised if your opponents have cameras there as well, and they’re not there to make your guy look good.
Therefore – like any work of art – once an event is public, it’s community property.
However, campaign cameras should not stop rolling when the event ends. In fact, what happens away from the event gives you your most powerful advantage. Access.
When the candidate leaves the stage, and the news crews and supporters head home, the campaign camera is still there.
In the hold.
In the car.
Everywhere but in the bathroom, and at fundraisers…two places nobody wants to see a candidate in action.
The campaign camera can give viewers things they will never get anywhere else. The campaign controls the footage. Events shouldn’t be faked or staged. You’re just looking for your candidate in their best light.
Think of it as an anti-tracker; who instead of looking for a gaffe – is waiting for that moment when the candidate gets their brilliant plan out there with such simple clarity and heartfelt passion that the other campaigns hope nobody ever sees the clip – and that the candidate never hits it that squarely again.
Think of it as an anti-paparazzo; who instead of waiting in the bushes to catch someone with their pants down – is looking for that unguarded moment away from the bright lights of candidacy, where the human being shows through, pushing to the top of the “have a beer with them†polls.
As a part of the team, a campaign videographer should become a familiar and welcome face to the candidate. They should build a rapport, and let the candidate know that they are a true believer; that only shining moments will see the light of day. A safety net will develop. The candidate will relax. They’ll stop being polite and start getting real.
Once that happens, you’ve hit a mother lode.
Your campaign will have what people want to see. The race for President is about the person and about personality. With its unparalleled access, the campaign camera can show that to the voters. People love to peek behind curtains, the campaign camera can give them that look.
Moreover, they’ll have to come to you to get it. No one else will have it.
There is a place for event films. There is a place for posting clips of floor speeches and news clips. But, people can get these things on their own. More and more people can create these things on their own. If they really want to watch a rally, they can tune in to C-Span and watch Road to the White House!
The unique position of a camera embedded with the candidate will create clips that funnel viewers through the campaign – and a venue to tell the story of the campaign like no other outlet can.
This brings me to an important point…that happens to be the Fourth Pillar. You’re telling a story.
A campaign is a natural heroes’ journey. Posting one speech after another has no arc. Shooting that way thumbs your nose at an underlying dramatic structure. The narrative of a campaign will take those people trained to check in by posting frequently, and hook them. So, when I return tomorrow I’ll try to tackle to most difficult of the Pillars for me to wrap my head around – continuity.
Gone ‘Til November
And now I’m back.
After many months out on the campaign trail, a few things I saw today – coupled with the election season being over – have called me back from dormancy here on Dropping the Gloves.
So, now that I don’t fear getting fired by one or more of my employers for blogging (considered “going on the record” by most…something only certain staffers are allowed to do), I’d like to share two things.
First, Patrick Roy will be inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame on Monday…at least that’s what I read. Bully for you, St. Patrick.

Second, the California Democratic Party may be on its way to an introspective moment following the results of the race for Governor. I may have been the only person to be on both campaigns – though some Westly folks did go over to the Democratic Party. I know the teams from both camps, and the candidates as well. Admittedly, I was much closer to Westly than to Angelides, whom I think subconsciously remembered me as a Westly staffer – and thus kept a watchful eye me.
In the whirlwind of it all, I don’t know where things went wrong. Emissaries of both camps are giving their opinions:
After spending $43.7 million running for the Democratic nomination, much of it on TV ads ripping into Phil Angelides, state Controller Steve Westly donated $2,500 to Angelides, his fellow Democrat … four days before Tuesday’s election. Angelides’ staffers said today they were astonished at the meager donation from multimillionaire Westly, especially after he inflicted so much damage on Angelides and then promised to unite the California Democratic party. (LA Times’ Political Muscle)
“When it was all said and done, in this year alone my primary opponent and Gov. Schwarzenegger’s team spent upwards of $120 million, most of it on media telling people a story about me…. Look, $120 million was just an avalanche of money.
—Phil Angelides (LA Times’ Political Muscle)Angelides political consultant Bill Carrick, who joined the campaign after the primary, said his client never recovered from a brutal contest for the nomination against Controller Steve Westly that tarnished his image and depleted his campaign cash.
“Phil came banged up out of the primary and didn’t have any money,” Carrick said. In focus groups, he said, Democratic voters were “repeating Westly’s ads.” (Sacramento Bee)
Looks like somebody passed out talking points in the Angelides campaign. Blame Westly’s money.
The Westly team was given notes by our former ringleader:
Autopsies are never pleasant or pretty. But sometimes they’re necessary to find out just how someone met their demise — and post-mortems are equally appropriate for failed political candidates.
Take Phil Angelides. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger demolished the Democratic gubernatorial nominee in yesterday’s election, despite a national trend that put more Democrats in office. Even a cursory dissection of his campaign reveals Angelides violated some of the most basic do’s and don’ts of politics — mainly the don’ts. (San Francisco Chronicle)
The points Garry lists in the Chronicle piece (and in “Phil, the unlovable loser” in the Times) will be well known to the readers of the comments section at Bill Bradley’s New West Notes or in the California Majority Report.
- Don’t assume voters know a single thing about you
- Don’t think voters hate your opponent as much as you do
- Don’t fight the last war
- Don’t make a tax increase the centerpiece of your candidacy
- Don’t run your own campaign
One thing is for certain. The Democratic party needs to look at this race very seriously, with talk of Schwarzenegger running for Senate in 2010. I personally don’t see the Governor as someone who’d seek to be one of one hundred. But, with 2006 a day behind us it’s apparently time to prognosticate!
Now that the election is over, the talk of the town has quickly turned to the post-Arnold era 2010 gubernatorial election.
On the Republican side, newly minted Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner already is the early favorite by virtue of an unlimited bankroll to fund his campaign. But the GOP’s conservative wing will surely have their say about challenging him at some point. With who is not clear, particularly given the blowout of the weak Republican bench in statewide contests last night.
Here’s our early line on the 2010 Governor’s race: (California Majority Report)
All told, my 2006 record…not too good. From when I joined the Westly campaign in December through election day I had a finger in eleven pies.
- My main gigs; Westly (primary) and Proposition 87 (general) lost.
- Angelides lost.
- My good friend, Van Tamom lost his Assembly race.
- David Roth lost in his challenge to Mary Bono in the 45th Congressional district.
- The five Republican House incumbents I made web ads about for Majority Action held their seats (though barely)
My saving grace, John Chiang will follow Steve Westly as California’s next State Controller. One for eleven ain’t bad…is it?
Toodles!

